2022 General - Voter Guide Ranking

2022 Clean Water Questionnaire Responses

To read each question, answer and candidate comments click below.

• Question 1 : Yes
  1) The Piney Point disaster spotlighted the problems inherent to Florida's phosphate mining industry, even as that industry seeks to expand. In 2018 the DeSoto County Commission rejected an application from The Mosaic Company to rezone 14,000 acres from agricultural to mining. However, the state has required the Commission to readdress the issue in 2023. If elected, would you support DeSoto County Commissioners and oppose ANY further expansion of phosphate mining in Florida?

  Yes

  Candidate Comment:

  Not only would I support DeSoto Commissioners but I would look at taking up zoning changes similar to what Charlotte County has done prohibiting mining. Not only does it show our opposition to the expansion of mining but can show regional solidarity to Commissioners facing the pressure from Mosaic.

• Question 2 : Yes
  2) New scientific research directly links human activity to harmful algal blooms, with researchers reporting that nitrogen flowing from the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee and areas upstream of the lake contributed to red tide in Charlotte Harbor, the Caloosahatchee Estuary, and presumably beyond, between 2012 and 2021. If elected, would you support aggressive local measures to address this, such as a moratorium on new septic systems, establishment of a stormwater system inspection and monitoring program and acquisition of additional land for water storage and treatment?

  Yes

  Candidate Comment:

  I believe that Sarasota County can work with the local water authorities to remove excess nutrients from our waterways that end up in the Gulf exacerbating harmful algal blooms. Continuing our sewer to septic conversion and taking a science based look at possibly changing the fertilizer ban dates to comply with new weather patterns.

• Question 3 : Yes
  3) State legislation, FDEP data and the Blue-Green Algae Task Force all report agriculture as the dominant source of phosphorus and nitrogen within most impaired watersheds of Florida. Do you agree industries and property owners should be held to clearly enforceable pollution standards and penalties; including mandatory adoption and verification of best management practices, and to implement inspection programs targeting septic, agriculture and industrial wastewater?

  Yes

  Candidate Comment:

  For far too long, these companies have polluted our waters and walked away from taking any responsibilities.

• Question 4 : Yes
  2) Florida is booming, with an estimated 1,000 people moving here every day. As a result, development is pushing growth further into Florida’s rural and natural areas, imperiling wildlife and natural resources like clean water. Will you oppose changes to your county’s Comprehensive Plan/Urban Development Boundary that would allow non-agricultural development in rural areas outside the urban, most densely developed area(s) in your county?

  Yes

  Candidate Comment:

  I think we need to look into best utilizing the land we currently set as areas for development. There is no rational need to build new developments into the environmentally lands in the east of the county.

• Question 5 : Yes
  5) Special interests in Florida spend lavishly to influence elections at the local, state and federal level. The sugar industry, phosphate mining industry and big utilities, among others, spend millions to aid candidates who then back their preferred legislation - too often, at the expense of clean water. Do you agree your campaign will accept no contributions from any source with ties to polluting industries including, but not limited to, the sugar, phosphate and utility industries?

  Yes

  Candidate Comment:

  We have not taken donations from these industries. Furthermore, we have not received donations from local developers who continually support destroying our 2050 comprehensive plan unlike other candidates on both sides of the aisle in this contest.